Mindful Imagination
Active imagination, Buddhist meditation, the body, and the brain
ARTICLE · WEN-YU CHENG, PSYD · OCTOBER 2026
Psychologist · Jungian Analyst · Neuropsychologist · Certified Hakomi Therapist
IN BRIEF
Knowing your patterns does not always change them. Change often needs lived experience, not only insight.
Mindful Imagination brings together Jung’s active imagination, Buddhist meditation, and Hakomi, a mindfulness-based somatic psychotherapy, so that inner images and body sensations can be met with steady awareness.
Recent brain research suggests that mindfulness may strengthen communication between the brain networks for imagining and for observing, which helps explain why this approach can work.
When understanding is not enough
Many people come to therapy already knowing a great deal about themselves. They can name their patterns around trust, closeness, conflict, or feeling misunderstood. Yet the same reactions keep returning, as if the knowing lives in one place and the change has to happen somewhere else.
Two old traditions speak to that gap. Jung’s active imagination invites us to meet inner images and let them speak. Buddhist meditation trains a steady, non-reactive way of attending to whatever arises. For a long time they were treated as opposites. My work brings them together through Hakomi, a mindfulness-based somatic psychotherapy, and with what recent neuroscience shows about attention, imagination, and the body. I call this integration Mindful Imagination.
Active imagination: giving a feeling a form
Active imagination began in a personal crisis. In 1912–1913, after his break with Freud, Jung felt disoriented and flooded by emotion. Instead of pushing it away, he turned toward it. He began building with stones by the lake, as he had as a boy of ten or eleven. Whenever he could translate an emotion into an image, he found he was “inwardly calmed and reassured.”
On December 12, 1913, he went further. Sitting at his desk, as he later recalled, “I let myself drop.” Images and figures arose, and he spoke with them. Near the end of his life he called those years of pursuing the inner images “the most important time of my life,” from which everything else was derived. Active imagination became central to his idea of individuation, the lifelong process of becoming whole.
In plain terms, active imagination is a conversation between the everyday self and what lives beneath awareness: images, inner figures, emotions, and body sensations. Marie-Louise von Franz described four stages:
Quiet the busy, critical mind. Set aside the running commentary.
Let an image arise. A dream figure, a scene, or a felt sense, in its own time.
Give it form. Write, draw, move, or speak it, so it does not drift away.
Meet it honestly. Respond to it as a real other and ask what it asks of you. Von Franz called this the ethical step.
Joan Chodorow condensed these into two movements: letting the unconscious come up, and coming to terms with it.
Buddhist meditation: is it really “passive”?
Jung studied Eastern practice for decades, with deep interest and real caution. In Mysterium Coniunctionis (1955–56) he judged the meditation methods of his day, from the Ignatian exercises to Indian-influenced theosophical practice, to be “of value only for increasing concentration and consolidating consciousness.” In his view they had “no significance as regards effecting a synthesis of the personality.” Many Jungians have since read this as a verdict on Eastern meditation as a whole.
My dissertation asked whether this is true. The answer turns on the word passive. Buddhist meditation is passive toward the content of what arises: the meditator does not chase, argue with, or interpret an image. But the attitude underneath is highly active: steady, alert, non-reactive contact with the present moment. Anyone who has tried to stay with a wave of grief in the chest, breath after breath, knows how much effort that takes.
Buddhist meditation has two main forms, and each prepares the mind differently. Active imagination takes a third stance:
CONCENTRATION · SAMATHA
Tuning a radio to one station
Rest attention on one object: breath, a phrase, an image.
Toward inner images: lets them pass and returns to the anchor.
Builds a steady, quiet ground, with less pull from the inner critic.
MINDFULNESS · VIPASSANA
Listening to the whole soundscape
Notice whatever arises (sensation, image, feeling, thought) without pushing it away or holding on.
Toward inner images: lets them unfold in their own way and time.
Builds a witnessing awareness that stays present without flooding.
ACTIVE IMAGINATION
Entering a conversation
Meet an emerging image or figure, speak with it, give it form.
Toward inner images: engages them directly.
Builds a relationship with the parts of yourself you have not known.
Jung himself pointed the way. In his 1929 commentary on The Secret of the Golden Flower, he observed that people who grew inwardly “did nothing (wu wei) but let things happen.” He called “the art of letting things happen, action through non-action” the key that opens the door to the way. Mindfulness is that same disciplined letting-be, in Buddhist form.
Jung also used meditative practice to steady himself during his own descent. “I was frequently so wrought up,” he recalled, “that I had to do certain yoga exercises in order to hold my emotions in check.” He did them only until he felt calm enough to return to the images. Concentration, in other words, was what made his active imagination possible.
Mindful Imagination: three movements
Mindfulness does not replace active imagination. It prepares the ground for it. In practice the two work in sequence, and we move back and forth between them as needed.
FIGURE 1 · SETTLE, LISTEN, THEN ENGAGE
CONCENTRATION (SAMATHA)
1 · Settle
Rest attention on the breath
Quiet the inner critic
Build a steady ground
MINDFULNESS (VIPASSANA)
2 · Listen
Notice body, feeling, image
No pushing, no grasping
Let it unfold in its own time
ACTIVE IMAGINATION
3 · Engage
Meet the image or figure
Speak with it, give it form
Ask what it asks of you
If it becomes too much, return to the breath and the body. Throughout, the body leads: images are felt before they are seen.
The way back matters as much as the way forward. If an image becomes overwhelming, we return to the breath and the body. Some people stay with settling and listening for a long time, and that is real work too.
What neuroscience adds
Twenty years of brain research help explain why this sequence works. The brain moves between three broad patterns of activity, sometimes called networks. They are not three separate brains, but three ways the same brain can be busy.
FIGURE 2 · MINDFULNESS HELPS IMAGINATION AND THE INNER WITNESS WORK TOGETHER
THE DAYDREAMING NETWORK
Default mode network
Memory, inner images, the story of who I am.
Stuck on its own: rumination
THE SWITCH
Salience network
Reads the body and decides what matters right now.
Mindfulness strengthens all three links
THE WITNESSING OBSERVER
Executive network
Holds attention and intention; knows I am having an experience.
Stuck on its own: overthinking
Together, images can arise while you stay present with them.
The daydreaming network supports memory, imagination, and meaning-making. It is the ground of active imagination. The same network, stuck in a tight loop, becomes rumination: replaying an argument at 3 a.m., or the inner critic that will not stop. The same network has two faces:
Memory. Flexible: used to make new sense of the past. Stuck: replaying old failures.
The future. Flexible: imagining what might be possible. Stuck: anxious rehearsal of what may never happen.
Inner images. Flexible: spontaneous, meaningful, alive. Stuck: repetitive and self-critical.
Early studies of experienced meditators found less activity in the hubs that drive this looping (Brewer et al., 2011). More importantly, mindfulness does not silence imagination. It strengthens communication among the daydreaming network, the salience “switch,” and the executive “witness” network. A trial with beginners found this after only a month of practice (Bremer et al., 2022). A review pooling twelve studies found stronger coupling between the switch and the daydreaming network after mindfulness training (Rahrig et al., 2022).
In plain language, the part of you that replays gets put in conversation with the part of you that can notice. A similar three-way coupling also predicts creative ability (Beaty et al., 2018). These findings describe group tendencies from fairly small studies, not guarantees for any one person.
That is the inner posture active imagination needs: letting an image come, while knowing you are the one having the experience. Too little witness, and imagery floods. Too much control, and nothing arises.
A newer, still untested idea adds one more piece. In a 2026 opinion article, Juha Silvanto proposes that mental imagery evolved out of interoception, the brain’s sense of the body’s inner state, so that images carry their felt, emotional charge with them. It resonates with what Jung described in 1913: before any image appeared, he felt the ground give way beneath him. This is one reason I so often ask where something is felt in the body.
What this looks like in therapy
Many people who find their way to this work can explain their patterns clearly, and still feel stuck in them. Insight matters, but on its own it often does not change how we feel, react, or relate.
In the therapy room, one way I bridge mindfulness, the body, and imagination is Hakomi, a mindfulness-based somatic psychotherapy developed by Ron Kurtz. Hakomi starts from a simple observation: much of what shapes our emotional lives runs outside awareness. Our beliefs about safety, belonging, worth, and whether we can rely on others live not only in our thoughts, but in how we breathe, hold tension, and brace against or reach toward people. Many of these patterns formed early, when they helped us adapt. What once protected us can later limit closeness, spontaneity, and freedom. Kurtz called the part of us that organized them the organizer of experience. Talking about it rarely reaches it. Noticing it as it happens, here and now, often does.
Hakomi is not meditation added to therapy. Meditation cultivates awareness of experience over time. Hakomi uses brief moments of mindfulness inside the therapeutic relationship, to study how a particular pattern is organized and to discover what new experience might become possible.
Most sessions begin with conversation. From there the work is collaborative and follows what emerges, not a fixed sequence. It often includes:
Safety and connection. The relationship comes first. Hakomi calls the therapist’s attitude loving presence: warmth, respect, and real curiosity about you. There is no pressure to share more than you are ready to. Your pace, your boundaries, and your “no” guide the work.
Listening to the body. As you speak, I notice small signals that usually pass unseen: a held breath, a hand that closes, a shift in posture or voice. Now and then I name one simply (“Something touched you there”), not to interpret it, but so we can both be curious about what it might be expressing that words have not yet caught.
Turning inward. At times I may invite you to pause the story and turn your attention inside, with eyes open or closed. You might notice a sensation, an emotion, a memory, an image, or an unexpected thought. There is nothing you are supposed to experience. You become a curious witness rather than a narrator.
Small experiments. In that mindful state, we try something small and notice what happens. I might say a short phrase in a quiet, neutral voice, such as “You don’t have to do everything alone.” It might bring relief, tightness, sadness, or an inner “that’s not true.” Each response shows something about how you learned to relate to yourself and others. Someone who has carried everyone else for years may discover how hard it is to receive care. Or, if your shoulders are bracing, you might support them with your own hands, so your body no longer holds that effort alone, and notice what comes when it can rest.
Body, image, and meaning. We slow down and stay with what comes: “Is that familiar?” “If that heaviness could speak, what would it say?” Sometimes a sensation becomes an image or an inner figure, and Hakomi meets active imagination: we can engage it and speak with it, as in the three movements above. At other times the work stays with sensation, emotion, or relationship. Either way, the experience often leads to something learned long ago, such as “I have to manage on my own.” Saying it while feeling it is very different from knowing it as an idea.
New experience, and returning. Understanding an old pattern matters, but change usually needs something more: an experience that was missing when the pattern formed. Being understood without having to explain yourself, receiving support without having to earn it, setting a boundary without losing connection. We make room for this a little at a time and let it settle in the body. Before we close, we notice what has shifted and come back to the room, so you leave grounded. All of this works online as well as in person.
Hakomi’s principles of mindfulness, nonviolence, organicity (the trust that your system knows its own way toward healing), and the unity of body and mind shape all of this. Protective responses are not obstacles to get past. They are meaningful adaptations, respected and studied with curiosity. The aim is not to make yourself feel something, or to get rid of difficult feelings, but a different relationship with your own experience, with more awareness, flexibility, and choice.
Hakomi and Jungian work are not the same thing. Hakomi listens closely to how the body organizes present experience. Jungian psychology engages the symbolic life of the unconscious and the longer arc of individuation. Meditation cultivates the awareness both depend on. In my work they inform one another without becoming interchangeable.
WHO THIS MAY HELP
This way of working may be meaningful if you:
Understand yourself well, but still feel stuck. You can explain your patterns and where they came from, yet the same reactions keep returning.
Live with anxiety, perfectionism, or chronic stress. You may look capable from the outside while finding it hard to slow down or rest.
Keep meeting the same relationship patterns. Trust, closeness, boundaries, or asking for what you need feel harder than you want them to.
Are more at home in analysis than in feeling. You solve problems well, but find it hard to know what you feel or need.
Carry the effects of earlier relational wounds. Automatic responses such as withdrawing, pleasing, staying on guard, or feeling responsible for everyone else’s feelings.
Are navigating identity, belonging, or a life transition. A move between cultures, a change of career, or a new stage of life.
Meditate, or are drawn to dreams and Jungian psychology, and want these to connect with the rest of your life. No meditation experience is needed.
You don’t need to be at ease with your body or emotions to begin. Many people notice very little at first, feel unsure about turning inward, or prefer to start with conversation. All of these are welcome starting points.
It is not the right first step for everyone. Meditation, active imagination, and Hakomi all ask for a steady enough sense of self and support in daily life. With significant trauma, frequent dissociation, or a very fragile period, we emphasize grounding, choice, and stability first, rather than long stretches of inward attention. Sometimes that takes weeks, and it is part of the work, not a delay. If you meditate on your own and notice increased agitation, numbness, or distressing images, it is wise to pause and talk with a professional.
If you would like to explore whether this way of working fits you, you are welcome to request a free 15-minute consultation.
Related reading on this site. Psychotherapy & Jungian Analysis describes how I work with individuals and couples. About Dr. Cheng tells more about my training in Jungian analysis, Hakomi, and neuropsychology. What Is Jungian Analysis, and Is It Right for Me? is a plain-language introduction for people considering this work.
Further reading
This article draws on my workshop Mindful Imagination: Active Imagination, Buddhist Meditation & the Hakomi Bridge (C.G. Jung Institute of San Francisco, 2026) and my doctoral dissertation (The Wright Institute, 2018).
Beaty, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., Christensen, A. P., et al. (2018). Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity. PNAS, 115(5), 1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713532115
Bremer, B., Wu, Q., Mora Álvarez, M. G., Hölzel, B. K., et al. (2022). Mindfulness meditation increases default mode, salience, and central executive network connectivity. Scientific Reports, 12, 13219. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17325-6
Brewer, J. A., Worhunsky, P. D., Gray, J. R., et al. (2011). Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and connectivity. PNAS, 108(50), 20254–20259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112029108
Cheng, W.-Y. (2018). Active imagination in analytical psychology and “passive imagination” in Buddhist meditation: How do they compare, why are they different, and where might they combine? Doctoral dissertation, The Wright Institute.
Chodorow, J. (Ed.). (1997). Jung on active imagination. Princeton University Press.
Jung, C. G. (1963). Memories, dreams, reflections (A. Jaffé, Ed.; R. & C. Winston, Trans.). Pantheon.
Jung, C. G. (1967). Commentary on “The secret of the golden flower.” In Alchemical studies (Collected Works, Vol. 13). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1929)
Jung, C. G. (1970). Mysterium coniunctionis (2nd ed., Collected Works, Vol. 14). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1955–1956)
Kurtz, R. (1990). Body-centered psychotherapy: The Hakomi method. LifeRhythm.
Rahrig, H., Vago, D. R., Passarelli, M. A., Auten, A., Lynn, N. A., & Brown, K. W. (2022). Meta-analytic evidence that mindfulness training alters resting state default mode network connectivity. Scientific Reports, 12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15195-6
Silvanto, J. (2026). The interoceptive origins of mental imagery: An evolutionary account [Opinion]. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1807114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1807114
Tang, Y.-Y., Hölzel, B. K., & Posner, M. I. (2015). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3916
von Franz, M.-L. (1980). On active imagination. In I. F. Baker (Ed.), Methods of treatment in analytical psychology. Bonz. Reprinted in M. F. Keyes, Inward journey: Art as therapy (Rev. ed., 1983). Open Court.
Weiss, H., Johanson, G., & Monda, L. (Eds.). (2015). Hakomi mindfulness-centered somatic psychotherapy: A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. W. W. Norton.